“And it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark.” — Revelation 13:17
Pax Silica is a U.S.-led strategic initiative launched in December 2025 to control the global supply chains for semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and critical minerals—by organizing a coalition of “trusted partners” to reduce dependence on China.
The name combines “Pax” (Latin for peace) with “Silica,” signaling a vision of a U.S.-centered technological order. The initiative is led by Jacob Helberg, the Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs, who framed it as a purpose-built alternative to forums not suited to managing the AI economy—the G7 and the G20.
Helberg was direct: “If the 20th century ran on oil and steel,” he said, “the 21st century is going to run on compute and minerals.” Compute is the processing power that runs AI. Minerals are the raw materials that make the chips and hardware possible.
The initiative spans everything from mining and refining, through chip design and fabrication, to data centers, energy, and logistics.
Helberg calls the underlying idea “innovation sovereignty”—the claim that a nation’s security no longer comes from controlling every part of the tech stack within its own borders, but from being a trusted contributor to a network the United States leads.
The founding declaration was signed by the United States and five partners: Japan, South Korea, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The initiative has since expanded to 24 signatories, including the European Union. Taiwan has separately endorsed its principles, and at a June 2026 summit, 35 economies signed a corresponding Joint Statement on AI Opportunity.
Pax Silica is not a treaty organization. It is a hub-and-spoke network: the United States signs bilateral declarations with each partner, tailoring the terms to what each country can contribute.
One partner supplies critical minerals. Another provides advanced semiconductor manufacturing. A third offers data centers or AI research capacity. The goal is to maximize the resilience of the whole network rather than have every member duplicate the same efforts.
The United States aims to mobilize more than $1 trillion in allied investment. The US government is contributing $250 million to seed the Pax Silica Fund—and asking its allies to pay for the rest.
The complications are already visible.
India—the only full BRICS member to join—signed on in February 2026, on a non-exclusive basis.
Kazakhstan, a BRICS partner country, joined both Pax Silica and China’s rival World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO), a 29-nation bloc headquartered in Shanghai that offers subsidized Chinese AI models to developing nations.
The European Union signed the declaration while simultaneously pursuing its own Technological Sovereignty Package—a set of legislative proposals, including Chips Act 2.0, designed to reduce Europe’s dependence on both American and Chinese technology.
And the United States is the world’s largest debtor. Its claim to global power has rested for fifty years on the petrodollar—the arrangement that made oil the foundation of dollar demand. That foundation is eroding. Pax Silica is the search for the next one.
Everything about Pax Silica—the coalition, the investment target, the full-stack scope—is designed to control the global economy. And the first prototype is already being built.
The Digital Passport
The digital passport is the operational heart of the Panama pilot. It is a cryptographic credentialing system for AI-related cargo—a verified digital record that travels with a shipment, certifying its origin, custody, and compliance status from the point of mineral extraction to the final destination. It is a log of every step in the chain.
The pilot itself is a twenty-four-month program the State Department commissioned in August 2026 for $50 million. Its first deployment is the Panama Canal—one of the most important shipping chokepoints on earth. The system must be designed and built from scratch.
Here is how it works. Every shipment of semiconductors, critical minerals, or AI infrastructure would be checked against that record. If verification confirms the cargo is from a trusted source and has followed approved routes, it gets pre-approved expedited processing and faster customs clearance. If the record shows a gap—an unapproved origin, a missing link in the chain—the shipment is held.
If the pilot succeeds, the platform expands to other Pax Silica countries. Every member economy would be plugged into the same verification system. Every shipment would be logged, credentialed, and either fast-tracked or held for inspection. The digital passport becomes the gatekeeper of the AI economy. Whoever controls the credential controls who gets to participate.
This is what “economic security” means in practice. Not merely secure supply chains—controlled supply chains. And controlled supply chains are not a new kind of power. They are the oldest kind. Whoever controls access to exchange controls the people who must exchange. Revelation 13:17 says no one can buy or sell without the mark. The mark is not on the hand or the forehead. It is in the ledger needed for life.
Here is the inversion that makes the American position unique. Proverbs 22:7 says the borrower is the slave of the lender. By that logic, the United States—the world’s largest debtor—should be the slave. Instead, it built a system in which its creditors are trapped by its debt. If the US collapses, they collapse with it. The debtor became the master—not by escaping the debt, but by making the debt shared.
Pax Silica is the attempt to extend that inversion into the next century. It is what you might expect from the world’s largest debtor, searching for a new anchor before the old one fails. The world’s largest debtor is in charge the way a man at the edge of a cliff is in charge of the people roped to him. If he falls, they fall too. And they know it.
One system determines which physical goods can move. The other determines how economic transactions within the network are priced and settled. Together they raise the question of who controls access to the next economy.
The Token Dollar
The “token dollar” is the financial layer of the Pax Silica architecture. It is a proposed evolution of the U.S. dollar’s global role, designed for the AI era. The idea is simple: make the U.S. dollar the default currency for pricing and settling AI computation—the “tokens” that AI models process and generate.
The parallel to oil is direct. The petrodollar system, built from 1974, made the dollar the mandatory currency for oil transactions. Every country that wanted oil had to hold dollars. The token dollar proposes that in the AI age, compute becomes the new strategic commodity, and it should be priced and settled in dollars.
Here is how the mechanism works. Every AI transaction, from a single query to a full model training run, is priced in dollars. The payment rails are dollar-pegged stablecoins—programmable digital tokens designed to maintain a one-to-one value with the US dollar. When global companies buy AI compute, they generate dollar revenue for US-linked firms. That revenue flows into the dollar-based financial system. The reserves backing the stablecoins are invested in US Treasuries. Every AI transaction, anywhere in the world, increases demand for US government debt.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank closely tied to the national security establishment, recommends the US lead a coalition to make the dollar the “default unit of pricing for token generation,” using dollar-backed stablecoins to settle these contracts and connecting the system to US futures markets.
This is where the three layers close into a loop. The physical gate—the Panama pilot—controls which goods move. The credentialing layer—the digital passport—determines who is trusted. The financial layer—the token dollar—captures the value. A country that wants to participate must align with Pax Silica’s rules, open its books, verify its supply chains, and accept the credentialing framework. Once that infrastructure is in place, every AI transaction within the network is priced and settled in dollars.
The loop closes like this. Global companies buy AI compute. They generate dollar revenue for US firms. The reserves backing the stablecoins go into US Treasuries. Dollar demand is reinforced. The US can borrow more cheaply. It funds its deficits. It projects power. It maintains the system.
The data shows this is already happening. More than 98% of agent-to-agent settlements over the past year used USDC, a dollar-pegged stablecoin issued by Circle, a private company that holds US Treasuries as reserves.
Between May 2025 and April 2026, autonomous AI agents settled roughly $73 million across 176 million on-chain transactions — an average of about 31 cents per payment. Separately, stablecoins processed $33 trillion in total on-chain transaction volume in 2025, surpassing Visa and Mastercard combined. That figure includes trading and DeFi activity, not just commercial payments. The real-world commercial volume was smaller — about $400 billion — but it doubled year over year.
If it succeeds, the token dollar is the financial abstraction endgame: the U.S. dollar becomes the system’s entropy accelerator. It takes massive amounts of real energy and resources and disperses them into digital abstractions. What remains is a number on a ledger—a number that must be fed still more energy just to persist.
If it fails, the US loses the ability to borrow cheaply, fund its deficits, and project power abroad.
The War That Isn’t
Pax Silica is being rolled out during a period of unprecedented geopolitical disorder. The United States has, by its own actions, been described as a rogue state by much of the world—it kidnapped Venezuela’s president in January 2026, and its president talks openly about seizing Canada and Greenland.
Why? What would explain this behavior?
If the United States were at war, it would make sense. War justifies extraordinary measures. War justifies the suspension of normal rules. War justifies the seizure of resources, the control of supply chains, the mobilization of allies.
But “the war that isn’t” is clandestine, and for a reason. A declared war would require public consent. A clandestine war requires only that the public not notice the alternative architecture on the other side.
BRICS—the bloc of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and six newer members—has spent a decade building institutions designed to move trade outside the dollar system. The New Development Bank, headquartered in Shanghai, has $100 billion in authorized capital and ten member countries. Its mandate is to finance infrastructure in emerging markets without the conditionalities that come with IMF or World Bank lending.
Critically, it is expanding local-currency financing—raising funds in member currencies and lending them in the same currencies, avoiding dollar conversion entirely.
BRICS Pay is the payment layer—a network that links the member states’ own payment systems (Russia’s SPFS, China’s CIPS, India’s UPI) into a single interoperability layer. It lets countries settle trade in their own currencies without routing through SWIFT, the Western-dominated messaging system that underpins most global banking. It is in pilot and phased rollout, not yet operational for all members. But the direction is clear.
There is also the Unit—a settlement instrument composed of 40% physical gold and 60% member currencies. It entered prototype phase in December 2025.
Here is what makes the BRICS model different from the American model. NDB loans are not debt into infinity. They are structured to be repaid. Loan tenures run from 10 to 30 years, with grace periods built in. They are increasingly denominated in local currencies, so borrowers repay in the currency they earn, not the currency they have to buy. And they come without the structural adjustment programs that the IMF and World Bank have used for decades—no forced austerity, no privatization requirements, no policy conditions that override national sovereignty.
This is the distinction that matters. The American system turns debt into a permanent asset. It rolls over. It expands. It requires continuous inflow. The BRICS system treats debt as a tool for development—borrow, build, repay, and then the infrastructure belongs to you.
Pax Silica is the mechanism by which the United States intends to maintain its position as the world’s hegemon in an era when the old foundations are failing. The BRICS system is the mechanism by which its rivals intend to route around it. Both are control architectures for the global economy—and neither is being debated as one.
The two systems are not at war with each other in any conventional sense. They are building parallel infrastructure. Pax Silica credentials goods. BRICS Pay settles payments. Pax Silica ties nations to the dollar. The NDB lends in local currencies to free them from it. Neither side is trying to destroy the other. Both are trying to make the other optional.
And the nations in the middle—India, the UAE, Kazakhstan—are discovering that optionality is leverage. They can belong to both systems. They can extract from both. They can refuse to choose, and no one can make them.
This is what the war actually is. Not a shooting war. Not a declared conflict. A slow, grinding competition to determine which infrastructure the next century will run on. Pax Silica is the American bid. BRICS is the alternative. And the middle powers are the prize.
What Comes Next
Pax Silica is a rolling program with a published timeline. Here is what to watch for over the next twenty-four months.
The Panama pilot. The State Department’s $50 million supply-chain credentialing tender closed in August 2026. The performance period is 24 months. The system must be designed, developed, and deployed from scratch. If the pilot works, the platform expands to other Pax Silica countries after that. Watch for which countries adopt the credentialing system and which resist.
The Token Dollar curve. Real-world stablecoin payments—not crypto trading, but actual commercial movement of money—doubled to $400 billion in 2025. Watch for which companies adopt dollar-pegged stablecoins for machine-to-machine settlement, and which countries try to build alternatives.
The membership expansion. Pax Silica has 24 signatories and 35 AI Opportunity Partnership economies. Watch for which countries join, which refuse, and which are pressured. Every new signatory is a country that has agreed to the credentialing framework in principle. Every refusal is a country that will face pressure.
The chokepoint squeeze. China controls the processing of rare earths and many critical minerals. The US controls advanced chip design and the high-bandwidth memory (HBM) that AI chips require. Watch for export controls, licensing regimes, and supply-chain credentialing to converge in the same direction. Whoever controls the credential controls the economy.
The dual-alignment squeeze. Watch how Washington responds to India, the UAE, and Kazakhstan. The US has already pressured countries to choose. The question is whether it will escalate. If the US escalates, it risks pushing these countries further toward China. If it accepts the dual alignment, it undermines the entire logic of the credentialing architecture. Either way, the overlap nations become the test case for whether Pax Silica can function as designed.
The domestic squeeze. The digital passport being piloted in Panama is a prototype. Watch for it to appear in domestic contexts—trucking, agriculture, healthcare, pharmaceuticals. The logic appears to be that the infrastructure is built in the developing world first, where resistance is lower. It arrives here last, after it has been normalized.
The WAICO squeeze. Watch how many countries join China’s rival framework and whether any of them also sign Pax Silica. Kazakhstan has already done both. India has joined Pax Silica on a non-exclusive basis. If more countries follow, the binary dissolves. If Washington pressures them to choose, the pressure itself becomes the story.
The lens matters more than any single event. When Washington moves against a government, ask which commodity it sits on. When it courts a country, ask what it can contribute to the stack. When it applies pressure, ask which chokepoint it is trying to secure. The pattern is not hidden. You simply won’t be told what it is.
The DARPA Question
There is one more dimension to this architecture that deserves attention—not because it is proven, but because the capability exists.
DARPA’s Safe Genes program has invested $65 million over four years in gene drive research and genetic remediation technologies. The stated purpose is biosafety and biosecurity: developing tools to combat bio-threats and reverse unwanted genetic changes. Gene drives can spread a genetic modification through a population—making a population of mosquitoes unable to reproduce, for instance. Genetic remediation technologies can undo such modifications.
No public document connects Safe Genes to population control. The scientists involved work on malaria eradication, invasive species control, and biosecurity. The evidence does not establish a secret depopulation program, and this essay does not claim one.
But the capability exists. The funding is real. And the stated purpose is not the only possibility.
A system that treats supply chains as traceable nodes has access to tools that treat living systems as manageable. Gene drives are part of the broader toolkit of state-funded biosecurity research. The question they raise is the same one Pax Silica raises: what happens when living systems become objects of technical management?
The Blindspot
Pax Silica is a plan to control physical resources with a financial system that runs on abstractions. That is the problem.
The plan treats compute as the new oil—an indispensable input that everyone must buy. But compute is not wealth. It is a tool. It is a means of production, not a store of value.
And it has a blindspot: energy.
Every AI model, every data center, every AI query requires enormous amounts of electricity. Training a single large language model can consume as much electricity as a small city uses in a year. The data centers that power AI require power grids, transmission lines, cooling systems, and fuel. All of it is physical. All of it is finite. None of it can be conjured.
The system has been able to pretend energy is cheap because debt has subsidized it. Cheap credit built the infrastructure of the fossil fuel age. Cheap credit let the system ignore depletion. Cheap credit made it possible to treat energy as a background assumption rather than the foundation it actually is.
But energy is not an assumption. It is the foundation.
Pax Silica can control the supply chain for chips. It cannot control the supply chain for energy. And energy is the chain that matters most.
Pax Silica assumes cheap energy. Remove it, and the plan collapses. No financial architecture can print the foundation it stands on. It can only build higher.
The verse at the top of this essay describes a system that determines who can buy and sell. Pax Silica is building that system through the architecture of debt. And like every architecture built on claims, it will eventually meet the thing it cannot print. When it hits that limit, the response will not be restraint. It will be the pursuit of total control.
That is the pattern. That is what the machine does when it meets a wall it cannot print its way through.
But the real question is not whether Pax Silica can work. It is whether it should.
References & Sources
CSIS. “From the Petrodollar to the Tokendollar: Economic Statecraft in the AI Era.” August 2026.
DARPA. “Building the Safe Genes Toolkit.” DARPA.mil, July 2017. https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2017-07-19.
Gulf News. “UAE commits $1.4 trillion to US economy over ten years.” March 2025.
The Holy Bible. Revelation 13:17.
International Energy Agency. Key Questions on Energy and AI. Paris: IEA, 2026.
International Energy Agency. Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2026. Paris: IEA, 2026.
Keyrock. “Who Pays the Agent?” May 2026.
The New York Times. “Trump Sets Up ‘Pax Silica’ Fund to Reduce Global Dependencies.” March 2026.
ORF America. “The Purpose and Promise of Pax Silica.” August 2026.
Reuters. “Exclusive: US to tell partners they must pick sides in AI race with China.” August 2026.
U.S. Department of State. “Pax Silica AI Assistance Project NOFO.” August 2026.
U.S. Department of State. “Virtual Press Briefing with Jacob Helberg.” December 2025.
U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026. Reston, VA: USGS, 2026.
If this essay resonated with you, I would love to hear your thoughts. And if you would like to support more work like this, you can support me on Patreon, BuyMeACoffee, or Substack. Thank you for reading.
A Note on the Art
The images in this essay are inspired by John Heartfield, the German Dadaist and photomontagist who spent his career disassembling the imagery of power. Heartfield took the photographs that the powerful used to present themselves—political propaganda, corporate advertising, the iconography of state—and reassembled them to show what they actually were. His most famous work, The Meaning of the Hitler Salute, showed a businessman’s hand raised in the Nazi salute, but the arm was made of banknotes. The salute was the money. The point was made without a word.
His work was forensic. He took apart what he was shown and revealed the parts.
This essay does the same with Pax Silica. It takes the official framing—”economic security,” “AI opportunity,” “shared prosperity”—and shows the control architecture underneath: the chokepoints, the payment rails, the dependencies, the extraction.
The images are photomontages in black, white, and red. Black and white for the starkness of the diagnosis. Red for the machine’s appetite. Together they mirror the words on the page: an anatomy of power, assembled from its own fragments.
“Outstanding, sophisticated, and mesmerizing…a spiritual intrigue similar to Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code.” —ForeWord Reviews